Tax relief on transfer of technical manpower in SEZs

The income tax (I‑T) depart­ment has allowed prof­it-linked tax deduc­tions to new Spe­cial Eco­nom­ic Zone (SEZ) units upon trans­fer of tech­ni­cal man­pow­er up to 50 per cent from an exist­ing unit — a fur­ther relax­ation from 20 per cent allowed ear­li­er in July this year. This will pro­vide a major tax relief to soft­ware and IT-enabled ser­vices com­pa­nies oper­at­ing from such units.

In Sec­tion 10A/AA of the Income Tax Act 1961, a tax ben­e­fit is dis­al­lowed if a unit is formed by split­ting up or recon­struc­tion of a busi­ness already exist­ing, or trans­fer of machin­ery pre­vi­ous­ly used for any pur­pose in excess of 20 per cent in value.

Restric­tions on per­son­nel trans­fer were not specif­i­cal­ly men­tioned in the I‑T Act but, in its July cir­cu­lar, the Cen­tral Board of Direct Tax­es (CBDT) includ­ed this, with a cap of 20 per cent, as tax author­i­ties were dis­put­ing claims of tax deduc­tions by tax­pay­ers on such trans­fers and this gave rise to litigation.

In super­s­es­sion of its ear­li­er cir­cu­lar, CBDT has now clar­i­fied that trans­fer or rede­ploy­ment of tech­ni­cal man­pow­er from exist­ing units to new unit in SEZ in the first year will not be con­strued as split­ting or recon­struc­tion of exist­ing busi­ness if the num­ber of tech­ni­cal per­son­nel so trans­ferred at the end of year does not exceed 50 per cent (against 20 per cent ear­li­er) of the total tech­ni­cal man­pow­er engaged in the new unit.

The cir­cu­lar allows the flex­i­bil­i­ty to account for the total man­pow­er at the enter­prise as well as unit lev­el, which is a great step to ease the tech­ni­cal­i­ties involved in the process. The deci­sion to not apply the rul­ing to cas­es which have com­plet­ed assess­ment is also a great help to the industry.

Assessee also has a choice of com­ply­ing with the con­di­tion of net addi­tion of new tech­ni­cal man­pow­er in all units being equal to 50 per cent of total tech­ni­cal man­pow­er of new unit in which case also 10A/10AA ben­e­fit would not be denied.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *